Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):717 – 738 (2004)
There is considerable confusion regarding the ethical appropriateness of using incentives in research with human subjects. Previous work on determining whether incentives are unethical considers them as a form of undue influence or coercive offer. We understand the ethical issue of undue influence as an issue, not of coercion, but of corruption of judgment. By doing so we find that, for the most part, the use of incentives to recruit and retain research subjects is innocuous. But there are some instances where it is not. Specifically, incentives become problematic when conjoined with the following factors, singly or in combination with one another: where the subject is in a dependency relationship with the researcher, where the risks are particularly high, where the research is degrading, where the participant will only consent if the incentive is relatively large because the participant's aversion to the study is strong, and where the aversion is a principled one. The factors we have identified and the kinds of judgments they require differ substantially from those considered crucial in most previous discussions of the ethics of employing incentives in research with human subjects.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Undue Inducement: Nonsense on Stilts?Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):9-13.
“When They See Us, It’s Like They Have Seen the Benefits!”: Experiences of Study Benefits Negotiations in Community-Based Studies on the Kenyan Coast.Dorcas M. Kamuya, Vicki Marsh, Patricia Njuguna, Patrick Munywoki, Michael Parker & Sassy Molyneux - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):90.
“Choosing Wisely” to Reduce Low-Value Care: A Conceptual and Ethical Analysis. Blumenthal-Barby - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (5):559-580.
Payment of Research Participants: Current Practice and Policies of Irish Research Ethics Committees.E. Roche, R. King, H. M. Mohan, B. Gavin & F. McNicholas - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):591-593.
Undue Inducements and Reasonable Risks: Will the Dismal Science Lead to Dismal Research Ethics?Alex John London - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):29 – 32.
Similar books and articles
Intrinsic Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: A Need for Disclosure.Sharmon Sollitto, Sharona Hoffman, Maxwell J. Mehlman, Robert J. Lederman, Stuart J. Youngner & Michael M. Lederman - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):83-91.
Monetary Incentives, What Are They Good For?Daniel Read - 2005 - Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):265-276.
Benefits to Research Subjects in International Trials: Do They Reduce Exploitation or Increase Undue Inducement?Angela Ballantyne - 2008 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (3):178-191.
The Ethics of Incentives: Historical Origins and Contemporary Understandings.Ruth W. Grant - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (1):111-139.
Paying Human Subjects in Research: Where Are We, How Did We Get Here, and Now What?Ari VanderWalde & Seth Kurzban - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):543-558.
The Human Subjects Trade: Ethical and Legal Issues Surrounding Recruitment Incentives.Trudo Lemmens & Paul B. Miller - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31 (3):398-418.
Ethics of Internet Research: Contesting the Human Subjects Research Model.Elizabeth H. Bassett & Kate O'Riordan - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):233-247.
CEO Incentives and Corporate Social Performance.Jean McGuire, Sandra Dow & Kamal Argheyd - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 45 (4):341 - 359.
Marketing Research Ethics: Researcher's Obligations Toward Human Subjects.Sami Alsmadi - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):153-160.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #171,812 of 2,172,025 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,025 )
How can I increase my downloads?