Theory and Decision 47 (3):229-245 (1999)

Abstract
This paper uses a two-dimensional version of a standard common consequence experiment to test the intransitivity explanation of Allais-paradox-type violations of expected utility theory. We compare the common consequence effect of two choice problems differing only with respect to whether alternatives are statistically correlated or independent. We framed the experiment so that intransitive preferences could explain violating behavior when alternatives are independent, but not when they are correlated. We found the same pattern of violation in the two cases. This is evidence against intransitivity as an explanation of the Allais Paradox. The question whether violations of expected utility are mainly due to intransitivity or to violation of independence is important since it is exactly on this issue the main new decision theories differ
Keywords Allais paradox  Common consequence experiment  Sure-thing principle  Intransitive preferences
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1005177230444
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.D. Kahneman & A. Tversky - 1979 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:263--291.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Repugnance or Intransitivity: A Repugnant But Forced Choice.Stuart Rachels - 2004 - In Jesper Ryberg Torbjorn Tannsjo (ed.), The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 163--86.
On Wakker’s Critique of Allais-Preferences.Jordan Howard Sobel - 2004 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):253-272.
Consequentialism and Rational Choice: Lessons From the Allais Paradox.Bruno Verbeek - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):86–116.
A Process Approach to the Utility for Gambling.Marc Le Menestrel - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (3):249-262.
Paradox Lost, but in Which Envelope?Olav Gjelsvik - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):353-362.
Survival Through the Allais Paradox.Ole Hagen - 1992 - Theory and Decision 32 (2):209-217.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
53 ( #205,613 of 2,462,448 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,313 of 2,462,448 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes