Confining 'Disenhanced'Animals

NanoEthics 6 (1):41-46 (2012)
Authors
John Hadley
Western Sydney University
Abstract
Abstract   Drawing upon evolutionary theory and the work of Daniel Dennett and Nicholas Agar, I offer an argument for broadening discussion of the ethics of disenhancement beyond animal welfare concerns to a consideration of animal “biopreferences”. Short of rendering animals completely unconscious or decerebrate, it is reasonable to suggest that disenhanced animals will continue to have some preferences. To the extent that these preferences can be understood as what Agar refers to as “plausible naturalizations” for familiar moral concepts like beliefs and desires, then they can make moral claims on us and provide support for intuitive opposition to disenhancement. Content Type Journal Article Category Original Paper Pages 1-6 DOI 10.1007/s11569-012-0142-6 Authors John Hadley, School of Humanities and Communication Arts, University of Western Sydney, 7.G.10b, Bankstown Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia Journal NanoEthics Online ISSN 1871-4765 Print ISSN 1871-4757
Keywords Disenhancement  Animal ethics  Animal Welfare  Animal rights  Confinement  Folk psychology  Dennett  Agar  Biocentrism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11569-012-0142-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,999
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mental Content.Colin McGinn - 1989 - Blackwell.
Kinds of Minds.Daniel C. Dennett - 1996 - Basic Books.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Animals and Technoscience.Christopher Coenen - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (1):1-4.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kathy Rudy: Loving Animals: Toward a New Animal Advocacy. [REVIEW]Anna Peterson - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):787-790.
Getting Over Systematics. [REVIEW]John S. Wilkins - 2012 - Metascience 21 (2):383-386.
A “Practical” Ethic for Animals.David Fraser - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):721-746.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Animals and Sociology.Kay Peggs - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-04-02

Total downloads
12 ( #451,717 of 2,275,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #217,304 of 2,275,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature