Simpler arguments might work better-reply

Philosophical Psychology 4 (1):61-64 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Simpler arguments might work better.Davida Y. Teller - 1991 - Philosophical Psychology 4 (1):51-60.
Two arguments against realism.Timothy Bays - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):193–213.
Group Cognition & Explanatory Simplicity.David Statham - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
Anselm's neglected argument.Brian Leftow - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
Essentialist arguments against descriptivism.Michael Mcglone - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (4):443-462.
A reply to McLachlan.J. Keown - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (4):255-256.
How to be a Pragmatist: C. I. Lewis and Humean Skepticism.John Greco - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):24-31.
Higher-order ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1066-1078.
Causal Independence in EPR Arguments.Jeremy Butterfield - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:213 - 225.
Three Arguments against Intentionalism in Interpretation.Michael Wreen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:283-287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references