Continental Philosophy Review 48 (2):123-142 (2015)

Sara Heinämaa
University of Helsinki
Several commentators have argued that with his concept of anonymity Merleau-Ponty breaks away from classical Husserlian phenomenology that is methodologically tied to the first person perspective. Many contemporary commentators see Merleau-Ponty’s discourse on anonymity as a break away from Husserl’s framework that is seen as hopelessly subjectivistic and solipsistic. Some judge and reproach it as a disastrous misunderstanding that leads to a confusion of philosophical and empirical concerns. Both parties agree that Merleau-Ponty’s concepts of anonymity mark a divergence from classical Husserlian phenomenology. I will question this view and demonstrate that Merleau-Ponty’s discourse on anonymity remains Husserlian in two important senses: it analyses senses in terms of constituting selves and communities of such selves, and it accounts for the formation of experience by the temporal sedimentation of intentional activity. The argument proceeds in four steps. The first section argues against the widely spread notion according to which Merleau-Ponty’s anonymous subject is collective. In the second section, I offer an alternative reading by demonstrating that Merleau-Ponty uses the term “anonymous” primarily to characterize the lived body of a personal subject. In section three, I introduce Merleau-Ponty’s idea of trace and show that for him both the perceived thing and the perceiving body are traces and as such refer to earlier constitutive acts of alien subjects. I then argue that Husserl’s concepts of sedimentation are crucial for the understanding of this idea. Finally, in section four, I show how Husserl’s theory of depresentation informs Merleau-Ponty’s discourse on anonymity
Keywords Anonymity  Personal  Subject  Merleau-Ponty  Husserl  Perception  Embodiment  Sedimentation  Depresentation  Ego  Phenomenology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11007-015-9329-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,447
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Visible and the Invisible.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1968 - Northwestern University Press.
Husserl's Phenomenology.Dan Zahavi - 2003 - Stanford University Press.
The Absent Body.Drew Leder - 1990 - University of Chicago Press.
Sein Und Zeit.Martin Heidegger (ed.) - 1927 - M. Niemeyer.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Intercorporeity and the first-person plural in Merleau-Ponty.Philip J. Walsh - 2020 - Continental Philosophy Review 53 (1):21-47.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Image and Ontology in Merleau-Ponty.Trevor Perri - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1):75-97.
Body.David Morris - 2008 - In Rosalyn Diprose & Jack Reynolds (eds.), Merleau-ponty: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing. pp. 111-120.
Merleau-Ponty and the Mystery of Perception.Taylor Carman - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (4):630-638.
Phenomenology of M. Merleau- Ponty.J. Pechar - 2009 - Filozofia 64:195-206.
Phenomenology and the Geometrization of Vision.Aurora Plomer - 1988 - Dissertation, Lancaster University (United Kingdom)
The Poetry of ‘Flesh’ or the Reality of Perception? Merleau-Ponty’s Fundamental Error.Paul Crowther - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (2):255-278.
Anonimato y subjetividad. Una lectura de Merleau-Ponty.Marina Garcés - 2008 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 44:133-142.


Added to PP index

Total views
64 ( #143,588 of 2,326,339 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #212,154 of 2,326,339 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes