Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):327-337 (1997)
We argue that the practice of engineering does not exist outside the domain of societal interests. That is, the practice of engineering has an inherent (and unavoidable) impact on society. Engineering is based upon that relationship with society (inter alia). An engineer’s conduct (as captured in professional codes of conduct) toward other engineers, toward employers, toward clients, and toward the public is an essential part of the life of a professional engineer, yet the education process and professional societies pay inadequate attention to the area. If one adopts Skooglund’s definition of professional ethicsI (how we agree to relate to one another), then the codes of professional conduct lay out a road map for professional relationships. As professionals, engineers need to internalize their codes and to realize that they have a personal stake in the application of codes as well as the process of developing the codes. Yet, most engineers view professional codes as static statements developed by “others” with little (or no) input from the individual engineer. Complicating the problem, questions of professionalism (such as ethics) are frequently viewed as topics outside the normal realm of engineering analysis and design. In reality, professional responsibility is an integral part of the engineering process.
|Keywords||professional responsibility engineering ethics engineering responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Teaching Ethics to Scientists and Engineers: Moral Agents and Moral Problems.Caroline Whitbeck - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (3):299-308.
An Historical Preface to Engineering Ethics.Michael Davis - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):33-48.
Science, Engineering and Ethics: Running Definitions.Raymond Spier - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):5-10.
Teaching Ethics in Science and Engineering.D. G. Johnson - 1993 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1:83-87.
Citations of this work BETA
The Responsibilities of Engineers.Justin Smith, Paolo Gardoni & Colleen Murphy - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):519-538.
An Approach to Integrating “Professional Responsibility” in Engineering Into the Capstone Design Experience.Steven P. Nichols - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):399-412.
Similar books and articles
Theoretical Considerations for a Meaningful Code of Professional Ethics.Karim Jamal & Norman E. Bowie - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):703 - 714.
Ethics for All: Differences Across Scientific Society Codes.Merry Bullock & Sangeeta Panicker - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):159-170.
Internationalizing Professional Codes in Engineering.C. E. Harris - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):503-521.
The Role of Professional Codes in Regarding Ethical Conduct.Nicola Higgs-Kleyn & Dimitri Kapelianis - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):363 - 374.
Engineering, Business and Professional Ethics.Simon Robinson (ed.) - 2007 - Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.
Sustaining Engineering Codes of Ethics for the Twenty-First Century.Diane Michelfelder & Sharon A. Jones - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):237-258.
Engineering Responsibilities in Lesser-Developed Nations: The Welfare Requirement.Charles E. Harris - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):321-331.
The Professional Engineer: Virtues and Learning.Simon Robinson & Ross Dixon - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):339-348.
The Role of Professional Societies: Codes of Conduct and Their Enforcement.Stephanie J. Bird - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):315-320.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads135 ( #34,122 of 2,153,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,555 of 2,153,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?