- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Cogito, ergo sum: Inference or performance?
Philosophical Review 71 (1):3-32 (1962)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Review: E. J. Lemmon, On Sentences Verifiable by Their Use; Jaakko Hintikka, Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance? [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (4):615-616.
E. J. Lemmon. On sentences verifiable by their use. Analysis , vol. 22 no. 4 , pp. 86–89. - Jaakko Hintikka. Cogito, ergo sum: inference or performance?The philosophical review, vol. 71 , pp. 3–32. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (4):615-616.
Sum is a logical consequence of cogito.Ronald Suter - 1971 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 32 (2):235-240.
Cogito, ergo sum as an inference and a performance.Jaakko Hintikka - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (4):487-496.
Cogito, ergo sum: Some reflections on mr. Hintikka's article.Julius R. Weinberg - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (4):483-491.
"Cogito, Ergo Sum": Neither Inference nor Performance.John T. Dunlap - 1976 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 57 (4):386.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
38 (#433,096)
6 months
1,457 (#575)
2009-01-28
Downloads
38 (#433,096)
6 months
1,457 (#575)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The unreliability of naive introspection.Eric Schwitzgebel - 2006 - Philosophical Review 117 (2):245-273.
Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy.David John Chalmers - 2022 - New York: W. W. Norton.
Is There Progress in Philosophy? The Case for Taking History Seriously.Peter P. Slezak - 2018 - Philosophy 93 (4):529-555.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo