The identity of the past

In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & Harry Silverstein (eds.), Time and Identity. MIT Press. pp. 95--110 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter discusses the obstacles faced by presentists after denying the existence of past and future individuals. Presentism must still account for the manifest facts about the past and the future, but problems may arise when the presentist attempts to provide an account of the past. There is nothing in the presentist’s ontology on which to base truths about the past. Also, there is a problem regarding singular truths about past individuals; if past individuals do not exist, then they do not have properties or stand in relations. If they do not stand in relations, then there is no way to talk about them because reference is a relation. Even the thought of them cannot exist since singular propositions about them do not exist if they do not. This chapter shows the absurdity of these conclusions and endeavors to prove the existence of past individuals.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-19

Downloads
64 (#251,759)

6 months
14 (#175,970)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Hinchliff
Reed College

Citations of this work

Presentism and Truthmaking.Ben Caplan & David Sanson - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (3):196-208.
Naïve Realism, Seeing Stars, and Perceiving the Past.Alex Moran - 2019 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (1):202-232.
A foundation for presentism.Robert E. Pezet - 2017 - Synthese 194 (5):1809–1837.
Ostrich presentism.Giuliano Torrengo - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 170 (2):255-276.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references