Argumentation 22 (4):555-569 (2008)

Abstract
Whereas there are many publications in which argumentation quality has been defined by argumentation theorists, considerably less research attention has been paid to lay people’s considerations regarding argument quality. Considerations about strong and weak argumentation are relevant because they can be compared with actual persuasive success. Argumentation theorists’ conceptions have to some extent been shown to be compatible with actual effectiveness, but for lay people such compatibility has yet to be determined. This study experimentally investigated lay people’s expectations about the persuasiveness of anecdotal, statistical, causal, and expert evidence, and compared these expectations with the actual persuasiveness of these evidence types. Dutch and French participants (N = 174) ranked four types of evidence in terms of their expected persuasiveness for eight different claims. Both cultural groups expected statistical evidence to be the most persuasive type of evidence to other people, followed by expert, causal, and, finally, anecdotal evidence. A comparison of these rankings with the results of Hornikx and Hoeken (Communication Monographs 74, 443–463, 2007, Study 1) on the actual persuasiveness of the same evidence types reveals that people’s expectations are generally accurate: How relatively persuasive they expect evidence types to be often corresponded with their actual persuasiveness
Keywords Actual persuasiveness  Argument quality  Evidence  Expected persuasiveness  Perceived persuasiveness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-007-9067-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,133
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Legal Moralism Reconsidered.Carl F. Cranor - 1979 - Ethics 89 (2):147-164.
Evidence and Ethics in Occupational Therapy.Justine Shaw & David Shaw - 2011 - British Journal of Occupational Therapy 74 (5):254-256.
Patient Preferences for Physician Persuasion Strategies.Dan O'Hair - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Expected Utility with Perturbed Lotteries.Gilbert W. Bassett - 1986 - Theory and Decision 20 (1):79-96.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-21

Total views
47 ( #226,774 of 2,448,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #451,050 of 2,448,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes