Kant or Cantor? that the Universe, if Real, Must be Finite in Both Space and Time

Philosophy 46 (176):121-132 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper has two parts. In the first, I try to show that Russell's arguments against the thesis of Kant's first antinomy are unsatisfactory; in the second, I argue that the Universe, if transcendentally real, must be finite in both space and time.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
26 (#598,685)

6 months
8 (#505,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Finitism and the Beginning of the Universe.Stephen Puryear - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (4):619-629.
Infinity and the past.Quentin Smith - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (1):63-75.
Transcendental and mathematical infinity in Kant's first antinomy.Jann Paul Engler - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Armchair Cosmology.W. H. Newton-Smith - 1972 - Philosophy 47 (179):64 - 66.
McTaggart and the Neo-Positive Entropists.William R. Shea - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (193):346 - 351.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references