Do Language-Specific Categories Shape Conceptual Processing? Mandarin Classifier Distinctions Influence Eye Gaze Behavior, but only During Linguistic Processing

Journal of Cognition and Culture 10 (1-2):39-58 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In two eye-tracking studies we investigated the influence of Mandarin numeral classifiers – a grammatical category in the language – on online overt attention. Mandarin speakers were presented with simple sentences through headphones while their eye-movements to objects presented on a computer screen were monitored. The crucial question is what participants look at while listening to a pre-specified target noun. If classifier categories influence Mandarin speakers' general conceptual processing, then on hearing the target noun they should look at objects that are members of the same classifier category – even when the classifier is not explicitly present. The data show that when participants heard a classifier they shifted overt attention significantly more to classifiermatch objects than to distractor objects, but when the classifier was not explicitly presented in speech, overt attention to classifier-match objects and distractor objects did not differ. This suggests that although classifier distinctions do influence eye-gaze behavior, they do so only during linguistic processing of that distinction and not in moment-to-moment general conceptual processing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,248

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Individual-denoting classifiers.Mana Kobuchi-Philip - 2007 - Natural Language Semantics 15 (2):95-130.
Engineering: aspects of the object field construction.Evgeniy V. Maslanov - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):43-47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-01

Downloads
59 (#415,310)

6 months
10 (#468,789)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”.Dan I. Slobin - 1996 - In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson, Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 70--96.
Language, Thought and Reality.Benjamin Lee Whorf, John B. Carroll & Stuart Chase - 1956 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 11 (4):695-695.
Language.Edward Sapir - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references