The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False, by Patrick Todd [Book Review]

Metaphilosophy 54 (2-3):364-367 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The open future, bivalence and assertion.Corine Besson & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):251-271.
Some Problems with the Russellian Open Future.Jacek Wawer - 2018 - Acta Analytica 33 (4):413-425.
Assertion and the Future.Corine Besson & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2018 - In Sanford C. Goldberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-504.
Knowing Future Contingents.Ezio Di Nucci - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):43-50.
Freedom and the open future.Yishai Cohen - 2023 - Analytic Philosophy 64 (3):228-255.
Fatalism and Future Contingents.Giacomo Andreoletti - 2019 - Analytic Philosophy 60 (3):1-14.
Wondering about the future.Stephan Torre - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (8):2449-2473.
Knowledge of Future Contingents.Andrea Iacona - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):447-467.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-25

Downloads
48 (#331,327)

6 months
21 (#126,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Ingram
University of York

References found in this work

Nefarious Presentism.Jonathan Tallant & David Ingram - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260):355-371.
Presentism and the objection from being-supervenience.Brian Kierland & Bradley Monton - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):485-497.
Changing Truthmakers: Reply to Tallant and Ingram.Ross Cameron - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 8:362.

Add more references