Disease Genes Are Not Patentable: A Rebuttal of McGee

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):425-428 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dr. McGee presents a cogent argument for the patentability of the diagnosis of gene forms that are found to be associated with disease or other phenotypic manifestations. We're convinced he's wrong. An analogy will help explain why

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What's So Special about the Human Genome?Arthur L. Caplan - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):422-424.
Culture, the Crack’d Mirror, and the Neuroethics of Disease.Grant Gillett - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):634-646.
Commentary: Treating the Patient Who Has the Disease.Eric H. Denys - 2018 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (4):738-740.
Terminal Suffering and the Ethics of Palliative Sedation.Ben A. Rich - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):30-39.
Book Review. [REVIEW]Mark Moller - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (2):291-295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
50 (#310,532)

6 months
7 (#592,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references