- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Personalizing the demands of reason
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43 (2020)
Abstract
Children come to joint action with a generalized sense of “reason,” which carries normative implications, before personalizing reasons. A general sense of ought precedes specific notions of individual perspective.My notes
Similar books and articles
How We Do What We Do: Joint Action and Spontaneity.Alexander Emil Leferman - 2021 - Dissertation, York University
How does it feel to act together?Elisabeth Pacherie - 2014 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (1):25-46.
Joint torque precedes the kinematic end result.William A. MacKay - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):283-284.
Proprietary Reasons and Joint Action.Abraham Roth - 2020 - In Anika Fiebich (ed.), Minimal Cooperation and Shared Agency. Springer. pp. 169-180.
Sharing a perspective precedes the understanding of that perspective.John Barresi & Chris Moore - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):513-514.
Reason explanation and the second-person perspective.Johannes Roessler - 2014 - Philosophical Explorations 17 (3):346-357.
Reasons, resultance and moral particularism.Moad Omar Edward - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):112-116.
Varieties of Normativity: Reasons, Expectations, Wide-scope oughts, and Ought-to-be’s.Arto Laitinen - 2020 - In Rachael Mellin, Raimo Tuomela & Miguel Garcia-Godinez (eds.), Social Ontology, Normativity and Law. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 133-158.
weighing reasons.Garrett Cullity - 2018 - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Normative and prescriptive implications of individual differences.K. E. Stanovich, R. F. West & J. Baron - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):668-668.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-05-01
Downloads
9 (#1,269,748)
6 months
3 (#1,206,820)
2020-05-01
Downloads
9 (#1,269,748)
6 months
3 (#1,206,820)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Becoming status conscious: Children's appreciation of social reality.Charles Kalish - 2005 - Philosophical Explorations 8 (3):245 – 263.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo