The animal sensorimotor organization: a challenge for the environmental complexity thesis

Biology and Philosophy 32 (3):421-441 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Godfrey-Smith’s environmental complexity thesis is most often applied to multicellular animals and the complexity of their macroscopic environments to explain how cognition evolved. We think that the ECT may be less suited to explain the origins of the animal bodily organization, including this organization’s potentiality for dealing with complex macroscopic environments. We argue that acquiring the fundamental sensorimotor features of the animal body may be better explained as a consequence of dealing with internal bodily—rather than environmental complexity. To press and elucidate this option, we develop the notion of an animal sensorimotor organization that derives from an internal coordination account for the evolution of early nervous systems. The ASMO notion is a reply to the question how a collection of single cells can become integrated such that the resulting multicellular organization becomes sensitive to and can manipulate macroscopic features of both the animal body and its environment. In this account, epithelial contractile tissues play the central role in the organization behind complex animal bodies. In this paper, we relate the ASMO concept to recent work on epithelia, which provides empirical evidence that supports central assumptions behind the ASMO notion. Second, we discuss to what extent the notion applies to basic animal architectures, exemplified by sponges and jellyfish. We conclude that the features exhibited by the ASMO are plausibly explained by internal constraints acting on and within this multicellular organization, providing a challenge for the role the ECT plays in this context.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Complexity, self-organization and selection.Robert C. Richardson - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):653-682.
The sciences of animal welfare.David J. Mellor - 2009 - Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Emily Patterson-Kane & Kevin J. Stafford.
Brain organization and behaviour.J. L. Dubbeldam - 1993 - Acta Biotheoretica 41 (4):469-479.
Agricultural technology, wealth, and responsibility.Gene Wunderlich - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):21-35.
Animal Liberation is an Environmental Ethic.Dale Jamieson - 1998 - Environmental Values 7 (1):41-57.
Complexity: critical concepts.Bill McKelvey & John Bragin (eds.) - 2012 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
41 (#380,229)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Argyris Arnellos
University of the Basque Country
Fred Keijzer
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

Complexity and the Evolution of Consciousness.Walter Veit - 2023 - Biological Theory 18 (3):175-190.
Genidentity and Biological Processes.Thomas Pradeu - 2018 - In Daniel J. Nicholson & John Dupré (eds.), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Complexity revisited.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (3):467-479.
Solipsistic sentience.Jordan C. V. Taylor - 2022 - Mind and Language 37 (4):734-750.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations