Belief-that and Belief-in: Which Reductive Analysis?

In Alex Gzrankowski & Michelle Montague (eds.), Non-Propositional Intentionality. Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
Authors
Uriah Kriegel
Institut Jean Nicod
Abstract
Let propositionalism be the thesis that all mental attitudes are propositional. Anti-propositionalists typically point at apparently non-propositional attitudes, such as fearing a dog and loving a spouse, and play defense against attempts at propositional analysis of such attitudes. Here I explore the anti-propositionalist’s prospects for going on the offensive, trying to show that some apparently propositional attitudes, notably belief and judgment, can be given non-propositional analysis. Although the notion that belief is a non-propositional attitude may seem ludicrous at first, it is admirably defended by Franz Brentano, whose analysis I propose to expound, update, and deepen here. The basic strategy can be thought of as follows. First, although the grammar of belief-that reports clearly suggests a propositional attitude, the grammar of belief-in reports suggests instead an ‘objectual’ attitude. Second, with some ingenuity all belief-that reports can be paraphrased into belief-in reports. Third, given certain general considerations, this paraphraseability recommends the view that the psychological reality of belief states is objectual rather than propositional. Nonetheless, I will argue, there are two very real costs associated with this non-propositional analysis of belie.
Keywords Brentano  judgment  belief  belief-in  propositional attitudes
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Against Propositionalism.Michelle Montague - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):503–518.
Brentano’s Ontology: From Conceptualism to Reism.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski & Barry Smith - 2004 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Brentano. Cambridge University Press. pp. 197-220.
The Philosophy of Brentano.Linda L. McAlister (ed.) - 1976 - Humanities Press.
Die Einheit der Intentionalitätskonzeption Bei Brentano.Werner Sauer - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):1-26.
Brentano and Aesthetic Intentions.Lynn Pasquerella - 1993 - Brentano Studien 4:235-249.
Not All Attitudes Are Propositional.Alex Grzankowski - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy (3):374-391.
Dual Systems and Dual Attitudes.Keith Frankish - 2012 - Mind and Society 11 (1):41-51.
Brentano on Inner Consciousness.Mark Textor - 2006 - Dialectica 60 (4):411-432.
The Phenomenology of Propositional Attitudes.Sørenarnow H. Klausen - 2008 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (4).
Brentano's Late Ontology.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski - 2003 - Brentano Studien 10:221-236.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-16

Total downloads
707 ( #2,912 of 2,287,749 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #6,295 of 2,287,749 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature