No reason to expect “reading universals”

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):293 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Writing systems encode linguistic information in diverse ways, relying on cognitive procedures that are likely to be general purpose rather than specific to reading. Optimality in reading for meaning is achieved via the entire communicative act, involving, when the need arises, syntax, nonlinguistic context, and selective attention.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are there universals of reading? We don't believe so.Max Coltheart & Stephen Crain - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):282-283.
Bringing development into a universal model of reading.S. Hélène Deacon - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):284.
Varieties of self-explanation.Dominic Murphy - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):155-156.
Rethinking phonological theories of reading.Kathleen Rastle - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):303-304.
The basic assumptions of e-z reader are not well-founded.Françoise Vitu - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):506-507.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
11 (#1,167,245)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references