Abuse in the name of injustice: mechanisms of moral disengagement

Asian Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):57-72 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Grounded in Bandura’s social cognitive theory of moral thought and action, we develop a conceptual model linking supervisors’ perceptions of organizational injustice and abusive supervision with moral disengagement mechanisms acting as the underlying process. Specifically, we elaborate why and how supervisors’ experiences of each type of injustice would trigger their adoption of distinctive moral disengagement mechanisms, which in turn lead to their abusive supervisory conduct. The present conceptual model sheds new light on linking organizational injustice to abusive supervision from a moral perspective. In addition, it also provides important theoretical and managerial implications to our current understanding of why and how abusive supervision happens

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Trust.Gloria Origgi - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (2):221-235.
The concept of injustice.Eric Heinze - 2013 - New York,: Routledge.
Superseding historic injustice.Jeremy Waldron - 1992 - Ethics 103 (1):4-28.
A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice.Laura Beeby - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):479-486.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-04

Downloads
29 (#547,420)

6 months
9 (#300,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yan Liu
The Catholic University Of America (Doctorate)