- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Evaluating the Quality of Research Ethics Review and Oversight: A Systematic Analysis of Quality Assessment Instruments
AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (4):208-222 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Holly Fernandez Lynch, Conflicts of Conscience in Health Care: An Institutional Compromise. [REVIEW]Armand H. Matheny Antommaria - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):63-64.
Values, quality, and evaluation in ethics consultation.Lucia D. Wocial, Elizabeth Molnar & Mary A. Ott - 2016 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (4):227-234.
Prioritizing initiatives for institutional review board quality improvement.E. Hall Daniel, Feske Ulrike, H. Hanusa Barbara, S. Ling Bruce, A. Stone Roslyn, Gao Shasha, E. Switzer Galen, Dobalian Aram, J. Fine Michael & M. Arnold Robert - 2016 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (4):265-274.
Conflicts of Conscience in Health Care: An Institutional Compromise [Book Review].Kimberley Pfeiffer - 2011 - Bioethics Research Notes 23 (2):33.
Review of I. Glenn Cohen and Holly Fernandez Lynch, eds., Human Subjects Research Regulation: Perspectives on the Future 1. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2014, 373 pp., $35.00 Paperback. [REVIEW]Erin Phinney Johnson - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (12):15-16.
Lynch, Holly Fernandez. 2008. Conflicts of conscience in health care: An institutional compromise: The MIT Press, ISBN 978-0-262-12305-1. [REVIEW]Robert D. Orr - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):389-390.
Adolescent oncofertility discussions: Recommendations from a systematic literature review.Dorit Barlevy, Bernice S. Elger, Tenzin Wangmo & Vardit Ravitsky - 2017 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 8 (2):106-115.
Systematic reviews of empirical bioethics.D. Strech, M. Synofzik & G. Marckmann - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):472-477.
Online public reactions to fMRI communication with patients with disorders of consciousness: Quality of life, end-of-life decision making, and concerns with misdiagnosis.Jennifer A. Chandler, Jeffrey A. Sun & Eric Racine - 2017 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 8 (1):40-51.
Problematic protocols: An overview of medical research protocols not approved by the LUMC medical ethics review committee.Derek Gideon Tersmette & Dirk Peter Engberts - 2017 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 8 (1):52-57.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-08-22
Downloads
18 (#860,222)
6 months
6 (#587,658)
2020-08-22
Downloads
18 (#860,222)
6 months
6 (#587,658)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?Effy Vayena, Minerva Rivas Velarde, Mahsa Shabani, Gabrielle Samuel, Camille Nebeker, S. Matthew Liao, Peter Kleist, Walter Karlen, Jeff Kahn, Phoebe Friesen, Bobbie Farsides, Edward S. Dove, Alessandro Blasimme, Mark Sheehan, Marcello Ienca & Agata Ferretti - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-13.
Engaging key stakeholders to overcome barriers to studying the quality of research ethics oversight.Holly Fernandez Lynch, Swapnali Chaudhari, Brooke Cholka, Barbara E. Bierer, Megan Singleton, Jessica Rowe, Ann Johnson, Kimberley Serpico, Elisa A. Hurley & Emily E. Anderson - 2023 - Research Ethics 19 (1):62-77.
How Do Accredited Organizations Evaluate the Quality and Effectiveness of Their Human Research Protection Programs?Holly Fernandez Lynch & Holly A. Taylor - 2023 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 14 (1):23-37.
References found in this work
How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.Carl H. Coleman & Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau - 2008 - BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):6-.
Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three african countries: Cameroon, Mali and tanzania.Jérôme Ateudjieu, John Williams, Marie Hirtle, Cédric Baume, Joyce Ikingura, Alassane Niaré & Dominique Sprumont - 2009 - Developing World Bioethics 10 (2):88-98.
Moving Toward Evidence-Based Human Participant Protection.Michael McDonald & Susan Cox - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):1-16.
Beyond compliance... is it too much to ask?Greg Koski - 2002 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 25 (5):5-6.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo