The Paradoxical Case of Payment as Benefit to Research Subjects

IRB: Ethics & Human Research 11 (6):1 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/3564182

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Protecting Research Subjects after Consent: The Case for the "Research Intermediary".Stanley Joel Reiser & Paula Knudson - 1993 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 15 (2):10.
Job Applicants as Research Subjects: The Case of a Rubella Vaccine Trial.Angela R. Holder - 1980 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2 (2):5.
Research involving the homeless: arguments against payment-in-kind (PinK).Toby L. Schonfeld, Joseph S. Brown, Meaghann Weniger & Bruce Gordon - 2002 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 25 (5):17-20.
The Need to Track Payment Incentives to Participate in HIV Research.Brandon Brown, Jerome T. Galea, Karine Dubé, Peter Davidson, Kaveh Khoshnood, Lisa Holtzman, Logan Marg & Jeff Taylor - 2018 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 40 (4):8-12.
Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants.E. A. Largent, C. Grady, F. G. Miller & A. Wertheimer - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (1):1-8.
The Case of Two Devices: Disclosure to Subjects Following Phase IV ("Post-Marketing") Research.James R. Anderson, Andrew Jameton, Paul J. Reitemeier & Ernest Prentice - 1995 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 17 (3):6.
Research with Deviant Subjects: The 'Dirty Hands' ProblemDeviance and Decency: The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects.Eleanor Singer, Carl B. Klockars & Finbarr W. O'Connor - 1980 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2 (6):10.
Why I Still Oppose Percapita Payment: A Response to Lewis.Ron Roizen - 1989 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 11 (4):11.
The Editor and the IRB: Should Journals Notify IRBs about Possibly Unethical Research with Human Subjects?Judith P. Swazey - 1986 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 8 (5):10.
Research with Human Subjects: Humility and Deception.Nancy M. P. King - 2018 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 40 (2):12-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-04

Downloads
50 (#102,555)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):78-85.
How Payment For Research Participation Can Be Coercive.Joseph Millum & Michael Garnett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):21-31.
Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics.Jonathan Pugh - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?A. Wertheimer & F. G. Miller - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):389-392.
A framework for risk-benefit evaluations in biomedical research.Annette Rid & David Wendler - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (2):141-179.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references