Ad hominem arguments, rhetoric, and science communication

In Martin Hinton & Marcin Koszowy (eds.), The philosophy of argumentation. Białystok: University of Białystok (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Ad Hominem Arguments, Rhetoric, and Science Communication.Carlo Martini - 2018 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (1):151-166.
A Case Study in 'ad hominem' Arguments: Fichte's "Science of Knowledge".Peter Suber - 1990 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 (1):12 - 42.
Valid Ad Hominem Arguments in Philosophy: Johnstone's Metaphilosophical Informal Logic.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Douglas Walton - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (2).
Argumenty „ad hominem” – ich rodzaje oraz sposoby oceny.Krzysztof A. Wieczorek - 2006 - Folia Philosophica 24:189--210.
Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Continuing Thoughts on the Rhetorical Wedge.Mari Lee Mifsud - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
Take My Advice—I Am Not Following It: Ad Hominem Arguments as Legitimate Rebuttals to Appeals to Authority.Moti Mizrahi - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (4):435-456.
Locke and Whately on the Argumentum ad Hominem.Henry W. Johnstone - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):89-97.
Ad Hominem Arguments.Douglas Walton - 1998 - University Alabama Press.
Rhetoric, technical writing, and ethics.Michael Davis - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):463-478.
Lightening up on the Ad Hominem.John Woods - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):109-134.
Argumentos contra la persona y conflictos de intereses.Luis Felipe Bartolo Alegre - 2021 - In Gustavo Arroyo, Omar Vásquez Dávila & Soledad Rodríguez (eds.), VI Jornadas de Lógica y Argumentación. Buenos Aires: UNGS. pp. 148-55.
Equivocating the ad hominem.Daniel Putman - 2010 - Philosophy 85 (4):551-555.
The Rejection of Testimony and the Normative Recommendation of Non-Fallacious 'ad hominem' Arguments Based on Hume's 'Of Miracles' and Canadian Law.Joel M. Buenting - 2005 - Auslegung 27 (2):1 - 16.
Review of: A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse by Lawrence J. Prelli. [REVIEW]Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1991 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (2):168-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carlo Martini
University Vita-Salute San Raffaele

Citations of this work

Genuine versus bogus scientific controversies: the case of statins.Carlo Martini & Mattia Andreoletti - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (4):1-23.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references