Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):387 - 414 (2004)

Abstract
We claim that divine command metaethicists have not thought through the nature of the expression of divine love with sufficient rigor. We argue, against prior divine command theories, that the radical difference between God and the natural world means that grounding divine command in divine love can only ground a formal claim of the divine on the human; recipients of revelation must construct particular commands out of this formal claim. While some metaethicists might respond to us by claiming that this account leads to an inability to judge between better and worse constructions of the commanded life, we propose that an analysis of the human response to divine love--theological eros--can be the basis for an articulation of a philosophical theology (in our case, negative theology) that can guide the religious believer toward generating particular principles for ethical action that are grounded in an account of divine action. By linking divine command to imitatio Dei, the believer can have confidence that her imitative acts of God are not inaccurate constructions of the commanded life
Keywords divine command  Novak  pragmatism  Maimonides  natural law  Rosenzweig
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jore.2004.32.issue-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,558
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reason with Baggage.Jonathan Milevsky - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (4):696-715.
Gender and the Ethical Given.Molly Farneth - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (4):643-667.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Divine Command Morality and the Autonomy of Ethics.Robert Audi - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):121-143.
Divine Simplicity and Divine Command Ethics.Susan Peppers-Bates - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):361-369.
Abraham's Dilemma.Robert Adams - 2003 - Finite and Infinite Goods.
Divine Command Theories and Human Analogies.John L. Hammond - 1986 - Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (1):216 - 223.
Divine Desire Theory and Obligation.Christian Miller - 2009 - In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 105--24.
Ockham as a Divine-Command Theorist.Thomas M. Osborne - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (1):1-22.
Ockham as a Divine-Command Theorist.Thomas M. Osborne Jr - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (1):1 - 22.
A Critique of Graber's Divine Command Theory of Ethics.John P. Reeder Jr - 1975 - Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (1):157 - 163.
Understanding Divine Authority.Christopher Dodsworth - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):190-208.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
45 ( #213,392 of 2,348,454 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #186,095 of 2,348,454 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes