Is the ontological argument ontological? The argument according to Anselm and its metaphysical interpretation according to Kant

Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (2):201-218 (1992)

Authors
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.1992.0028
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,481
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Eine Grüblerische Argutation? Kant Und Hegel Zum Sein Als Position.Hector Ferreiro - 2016 - In Georgi Donev, Silviya Kristeva, Atanaska Cholakova & Reinhard Hesse (eds.), Back to Metaphysics. Blagoevgrad: University Press “Neofit Rilski”. pp. 259-277.
Traces of Reduction: Marion and Heidegger on the Phenomenon of Religion.Brian Rogers - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (2):184-205.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
217 ( #29,473 of 2,248,507 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #57,194 of 2,248,507 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature