Truth by default

Philosophia Mathematica 9 (1):5-20 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is no preferred reduction of number theory to set theory. Nonetheless, we confidently accept axioms obtained by substituting formulas from the language of set theory into the induction axiom schema. This is only possible, it is argued, because our acceptance of the induction axioms depends solely on the meanings of aritlunetical and logical terms, which is only possible if our 'intended models' of number theory are standard. Similarly, our acceptance of the second-order natural deduction rules depends solely on the meanings of the logical terms, which implies, it is argued, that our second-order quantifiers have to be standard.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
113 (#155,336)

6 months
22 (#159,331)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vann McGee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

Two conceptions of truth? – Comment.V. Mc Gee - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 124 (1):71 - 104.
Review: Two Conceptions of Truth? Comment. [REVIEW]Vann McGee - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 124 (1):71 - 104.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy of logic.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1970 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Edited by Simon Blackburn & Keith Simmons.
Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study.Dag Prawitz - 1965 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
Philosophy of Logic.W. V. Quine - 2005-01-01 - In José Medina & David Wood (eds.), Truth. Blackwell.

View all 22 references / Add more references