Intrinsicness, Duplication and Relations to Times

Abstract

The principal aim of this paper is to defend a certain view about temporary properties from an important objection to that view. More specifically, I will be defending the view that ostensible temporary intrinsic properties are really relations between the things that have those properties and times. The objection is, roughly speaking, that by construing ostensible temporary intrinsics as relations to times, persisting things are impoverished, being clothed only by their essential (and perhaps also their permanent) intrinsic properties. The worry is that the relations to times view moves us towards thinking of persisting particulars as being quite bare. I do not suggest that this is the only difficulty for the relations to times view (in fact, I uncover a potential problem for the view in Section 3), but it is an important one. If the objection is successfully addressed, then a significant obstacle to the relations to times view is overcome

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The argument from temporary intrinsics.Ryan Wasserman - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):413 – 419.
The Problem of Temporary Intrinsics.Montserrat Bordes - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 90–92.
Why Temporary Properties Are Not Relations Be- tween Physical Objects and Times.Katherine Hawley - 1998 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2):211–216.
A (Limited) Defence of Priorianism.Daniel Deasy - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (10):2037-2062.
Tenseless times.Joshua Rasmussen - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (12):3221-3227.
Events.Frederick F. Schmitt - 1983 - Erkenntnis 20 (3):281 - 293.
Arda Denkel's resemblance nominalism.D. M. Armstrong - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (165):478-482.
What Are Quantities?Joongol Kim - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (4):792-807.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
108 (#161,008)

6 months
108 (#48,608)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neil McKinnon
Monash University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references