An Unfortunate Experiment?

&
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (3):268-271 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract:This report describes the system of ethical review that was adopted in New Zealand based on the findings and recommendations from the Cartwright Inquiry in 1988. It discusses the changes made to this system under recent governmental initiatives enacted by the National Party, and some of the implications of those changes.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s096318011300087x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Report From New Zealand:An “Unfortunate Experiment”.Alastair V. Campbell - 1989 - Bioethics 3 (1):59-66.
The politicisation of ethics review in New Zealand.Martin Tolich - 2015 - Auckland, New Zealand: Dunmore Publishing.
Correcting Error in Academic Publishing: An Ethical Responsibility.Phillida Bunkle - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (4):665-673.
The Legacy of the Cartwright Report: “Lest It Happen Again”.Marie Bismark & Jennifer Morris - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (4):425-429.
Shifting from research governance to research ethics: A novel paradigm for ethical review in community-based research.Jay Marlowe & Martin Tolich - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (4):178-191.
New Zealand Research Ethics Committee Matters.Andrew Moore - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (4):132-135.
Informed Consent in Croatia.Luka Vučemilo & Ana Borovečki - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (3):356-360.
Non-human Animals as Research Participants: Ethical Practice in Animal Assisted Interventions and Research in Aotearoa/New Zealand.Catherine M. Smith, Emma Tumilty, Peter Walker & Gareth J. Treharne - 2018 - In Catriona Ida Macleod, Jacqueline Marx, Phindezwa Mnyaka & Gareth J. Treharne (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 99-115.
Reforming the ethical review system: balancing the rights and interests of research participants with the duty to facilitate good research.E. Cave & C. Nichols - 2007 - Clinical Ethics 2 (2):74-79.
Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects.Lisa Eckenwiler - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):37-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-29

Downloads
17 (#213,731)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lynne Bowyer
University of Otago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Empirical issues in informed consent for research.James Flory, David Wendler & Ezekiel Emanuel - 2008 - In Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 645--60.

Add more references