Response to Austriaco on Vaccine Passports

Ethics and Medics 46 (4):4-4 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay clarifies the author’s objections to COVID-19 vaccine credentials voiced in “The Ethics of COVID-19 Vaccine Passports.” The author’s objections centered on discriminatory practices based on vaccine status for domestic social and work activities, but he agrees with the World Health Organization that these credentials should not be required for international travel. In addition, there is a significant ethical different between currently available COVID-19 vaccines and the yellow fever vaccine because the former are produced or tested using abortion-derived cell lines. The yellow fever vaccine is much less ethically problematic. This situation could change with the approval of new COVID-19 vaccines without links to abortion-derived cell lines.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of COVID-19 Vaccine Passports.Joseph Meaney - 2021 - Ethics and Medics 46 (4):1-2.
Vaccine passports and health disparities: a perilous journey.Nancy S. Jecker - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (12):957-960.
Requests for Elective Amputation.Nicanor P. G. Austriaco - 2011 - Ethics and Medics 36 (2):1-2.
Is Gardasil Good Medicine?Timothy P. Collins - 2010 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (3):459-469.
Developmental Systems Theory and Human Embryos.Kevin C. Elliott - 2005 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (2):249-259.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references