Papineau on the intuition of distinctness

SWIF Philosophy of Mind 4 (1) (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Critical comments on David Papineau's idea that people find physicalism about phenomenal consciousness unbelievable because they commit what he calls the 'antipathetic fallacy'.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Papineau on Phenomenal Concepts. [REVIEW]Tim Crane - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):155-162.
The Intuition of Distinctness.David Papineau - 2002 - In Thinking About Consciousness. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Some Thoughts About Thinking About Consciousness.Diana Raffman - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):163-163.
Papineau on Sensory Experience.Alex Byrne - 2023 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Mind 3:308-17.
Truth and Content in Sensory Experience.Angela Mendelovici - 2023 - In Uriah Kriegel (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Mind Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 318–338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
194 (#104,089)

6 months
53 (#97,659)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Melnyk
University of Missouri, Columbia

Citations of this work

What Exactly is the Explanatory Gap?David Papineau - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (1):5-19.
Phenomenal Concepts.Pär Sundström - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (4):267-281.
Kripke's proof is ad hominem not two-dimensional.David Papineau - 2007 - Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):475–494.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking about Consciousness.David Papineau - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (215):333-335.

Add more references