Responsibility, taint, and ethical distance in business ethics

Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):125 - 132 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much light can be shed on events which characterize or underlie scandals at firms such as Enron, Arthur Andersen, Worldcom, ImClone, and Tyco by appealing to the notion of ethical distance. Various inquiries have highlighted the difficulties in finding or identifying particular individuals to blame for particular events, and in the context of situations as complex as these it can sometimes be helpful to investigate the comparative ethical distance of various participants in these events. In this essay I offer a characterization of ethical distance in terms of moral responsibility, and in doing so I describe and illustrate the rough inverse correlation between moral distance and degrees of moral responsibility. I urge that the concept of ethical distance is capable of shedding light upon situations in which several people are involved in bringing about a state of affairs. I then argue that moral responsibility cannot do justice to all situations involving ethical distance. When the distance between a person and a state of affairs grows sufficiently large, a different type of treatment is called for, and I introduce the notion of moral taint to describe the moral status of agents in these situations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral distance in dictators games.Fernando Aguiar, Pablo Brañas-Garza & Luis Miller - 2008 - Judgment and Decision Making 3 (4):344-354.
The Relevance of Responsibility to Ethical Business Decisions.Patrick E. Murphy - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S2):245 - 252.
Management ethics.Norman E. Bowie - 2005 - Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edited by Patricia Hogue Werhane.
Social Products Liability.George G. Brenkert - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):21-32.
Beyond Good and Evil: The Adiaphoric Company. [REVIEW]Tommy Jensen - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3):425 - 434.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#346,431)

6 months
7 (#433,721)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Mellema
Calvin College

Citations of this work

Taboos in Corporate Social Responsibility Discourse.Tomi J. Kallio - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 74 (2):165-175.
Corporate Psychological Defences: An Oil Spill Case.T. Ketola - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 65 (2):149-161.
Dialogue and scrutiny in organizational ethics.Kevin Morrell & Michael Anderson - 2006 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 15 (2):117–129.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Collective responsibility.Joel Feinberg - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (21):674-688.
Racism and Moral Pollution.Anthony Appiah - 1986 - Philosophical Forum 18 (2):185.

Add more references