End of 2016: Can We Save Research from Predators in 2017?

Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1339-1345 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the beginning of every year, we expect to see worthwhile improvements on the past. The end of 2016 showcased many important issues in the scientific world, ranging from criticisms of research misconduct and fraud to the introduction of new scientometrics. Despite the scientific community’s continuing efforts, predatory journals and publishers are still on the rise, and the Beall’s list calls attention to the need to take a firm action across the board. This short opinion piece highlights research conducted by the scholarly community on research publication predators during 2016, and offers suggestions as to how to bring about future improvements.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An introduction to research ethics.Paul J. Friedman - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):443-456.
Open access, research communities, and a defense against predatory journals.Jeffrey Beall - 2021 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 2 (1):14-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-14

Downloads
26 (#598,685)

6 months
10 (#382,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Scholarly Black Market.Shahryar Sorooshian - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2):623-624.
The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics.Stefan Eriksson & Gert Helgesson - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (2):163-170.
Conference Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing.Shahryar Sorooshian - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (6):1805-1806.

View all 6 references / Add more references