Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (3):273-282 (2015)
AbstractThe debate on the cognitive value of literature is undergoing a change. On the one hand, several philosophers recommend an epistemological move from “knowledge” to “understanding” in describing the cognitive benefits of literature. On the other hand, skeptics call for methodological discussion and demand evidence for the claim that readers actually learn from literature. These two ideas, the notion of understanding and the demand for evidence, seem initially inconsistent, for the notion of understanding implies that the cognitive benefits of literature are ultimately nonverbal and thus inarticulate. In this article, I defend both the move from knowledge to understanding and the demand for evidence. After proposing that the cognitive value of literature is best construed in terms of enhancing the reader's understanding, I argue that the place to look for evidence for the cognitive benefits of literature is not the laboratory but the practice of literature
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Can Science Fiction Engagement Predict Identification with All Humanity? Testing a Moderated Mediation Model.Fuzhong Wu, Mingjie Zhou & Zheng Zhang - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Similar books and articles
Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanists.Patrick Colm Hogan - 2003 - Routledge.
Neuroscience, Self-Understanding, and Narrative Truth.Mary Jean Walker - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (4):63-74.
Explanatory Pluralism in Cognitive Science.Rick Dale, Eric Dietrich & Anthony Chemero - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (2):739-742.
The Concept of Literary Application: Readers' Analogies From Text to Life.Anders Pettersson - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
On Pritchard, Objectual Understanding and the Value Problem.J. Adam Carter & Emma C. Gordon - forthcoming - American Philosophical Quarterly.
IV—Understanding and Knowing.Paulina Sliwa - 2015 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115 (1pt1):57-74.
Misogynous Economies the Business of Literature in Eighteenth-Century Britain.Laura Mandell - 1999 - University Press of Kentucky.
Beyond Understanding: Appeals to the Imagination, Passions, and Will in Mid-Nineteenth-Century American Women's Fiction.Martha L. Henning - 1996 - Peter Lang.
Erratum: Literature and Philosophy: Emotion and Knowledge?Isabella Wheater - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (309):501-501.