Nature's subtlety undermines the empirical relevance of both dynamical and computational hypotheses

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):646-647 (1998)
Abstract
Technical hitches mar van Gelder's proposed map of the conceptual landscape, particularly with respect to descriptive levels and the trio of instantiation, realisation, and implementation. However, for all the formal quibbles, van Gelder is onto something important; the tension he notes between computationalism and a dynamical alternative threatens to transform the way we conduct cognitive science research.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X9843173X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,848
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
6 ( #608,020 of 2,210,416 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #387,753 of 2,210,416 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature