Modal Logic and the Ontological Proof for God's Existence

Review of Metaphysics 17 (2):235 - 242 (1963)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Now it cannot be denied, I think, that this argument has the appearance of being sound, that is, both true in its premises and valid in its conclusion. But one surely ought to harbor suspicions concerning an argument which establishes the most momentous of all conclusions upon nothing more than a few propositions. In this paper I shall attempt to show that these suspicions are well-founded by pointing out that the above "proof" derives whatever force it has from an equivocation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Faith and the Existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:121-143.
Faith and the Existence of God: Arguments for the Existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 24:121-133.
Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Aristotle’s Elegktikōs Apodeixai.Michael Oliver Wiitala - 2012 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:129-140.
What the Ontological Proof Does Not Do.Charles Hartshorne - 1964 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (4):608 - 609.
Rejoinder to Purtill.Charles Hartshorne - 1967 - Review of Metaphysics 21 (2):308 - 309.
Burdens of Proof.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
40 (#410,325)

6 months
8 (#415,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?