Naturally nested, but why dual process?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):276-277 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article by Barbey & Sloman (B&S) provides a valuable framework for integrating research on base-rate neglect and respect. The theoretical arguments and data supporting the nested set model are persuasive. But we found the dual-process account to be under-specified and less compelling. Our concerns are based on (a) inconsistencies within the literature cited by B&S, and (b) studies of base-rate neglect in categorization

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nested sets and base-rate neglect: Two types of reasoning?Wim De Neys - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):260-261.
Base-rate respect meets affect neglect.Paul Whitney, John M. Hinson & Allison L. Matthews - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):285-286.
From base-rate to cumulative respect.C. Philip Beaman & Rachel McCloy - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):256-257.
Dual concerns with the dualist approach.David A. Lagnado & David R. Shanks - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):271-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#398,421)

6 months
12 (#304,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references