Is cultivating “biological blindness” a viable route to understanding behavioral phenomena?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):220-221 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mitchell et al. propose that associative learning in humans and other animals requires the formation of propositions by means of conscious and controlled reasoning. This approach neglects important aspects of current thinking in evolutionary biology and neuroscience that support the claim that learning, here exemplified by fear learning, neither needs to be conscious nor controlled

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The computational nature of associative learning.N. A. Schmajuk & G. M. Kutlu - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):223-224.
Associative learning without reason or belief.James D. Miles, Robert W. Proctor & E. J. Capaldi - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):217-218.
Cognition, consciousness, and the cognitive revolution.John D. Greenwood - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):209-210.
The associative nature of human associative learning.David R. Shanks - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):225-226.
A causal framework for integrating learning and reasoning.David A. Lagnado - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):211-212.
How do we get from propositions to behavior?Daniel A. Sternberg & James L. McClelland - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):226-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-24

Downloads
41 (#112,661)

6 months
9 (#1,260,759)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations