Journal of Business Ethics 139 (4):737-754 (2016)

This paper evaluates the ways in which European business schools are implementing sustainability and ethics into their curricula. Drawing on data gathered by a recent large study that the Academy of Business in Society conducted in cooperation with EFMD, we map the approaches that schools are currently employing by drawing on and expanding Rusinko’s :507–519 2010) and Godemann et al.’s matrice of integrating sustainability in business and management schools. We show that most schools adopt one or more of the four approaches outlined by Godemann et al.. However, we also argue that a fifth dimension needs to be added as the existing matrices do not capture the systemic nature of such curricular initiatives and how these are influenced by internal factors within the business school and external factors beyond. We suggest calling this fifth dimension ‘Systemic Institutional Integration’ and demonstrate that any business school which aims to integrate sustainability further into the curricula cannot succeed without the following: Systemic thinking and systemic leadership, Connectedness to business, the natural environment and society and Institutional capacity building. Utilising further literature and the answers provided by the deans and faculty, we discuss each factor in turn and suggest paths towards the successful systemic institutional integration of sustainability and ethics into management education.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2896-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

You Reap What You Sow: How MBA Programs Undermine Ethics.Matthias Philip Hühn - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 121 (4):527-541.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Barriers to Change: Bringing Sustainable Development and Climate Change Content Into the Curriculum.Terri Friel & Josetta Mclaughlin - 2012 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 23:309-321.
Business Ethics: A Classroom Priority? [REVIEW]Allayne B. Pizzolatto & Sandra Bevill - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):153 - 158.
Exploring Business School Ethics.Johannes Brinkmann & Ken Peattie - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 2 (2):151-169.
What Should Business Schools Teach Managers?Gordon Pearson Martin Parker - 2013 - Business and Society Review 118 (1):1-22.
A Framework for Business Ethics Education.A. Scott Carson - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 10:185-210.
Stories From the Trenches: Reflections on Integrating Sustainability Into CSR/BE Courses.Aimee Dars Ellis - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:383-389.
10.5840/Jbee2011817.Johannes Brinkmann - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):83-104.
Assessing the Construct Validity of the Global 100 Sustainability Ranking for Schools of Business.Gerald W. Mclaughlin & Josetta S. Mclaughlin - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:274-286.
Novo Nordisk A/S: Integrating Sustainability Into Business Practice.Mette Morsing & Dennis Oswald - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 5 (special issue):193-222.


Added to PP index

Total views
18 ( #605,665 of 2,499,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes