British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):595-609 (2005)
The object of this paper is to reply to Morrison's () claim that while ‘structural unity’ was achieved at the level of the mathematical models of population genetics in the early synthesis, there was explanatory disunity. I argue to the contrary, that the early synthesis effected by the founders of theoretical population genetics was unifying and explanatory both. Defending this requires a reconsideration of Morrison's notion of explanation. In Morrison's view, all and only answers to ‘why’ questions which include the ‘cause or mechanism’ for some phenomenon count as explanatory. In my view, mathematical demonstrations that answer ‘how possibly’ and ‘why necessarily’ questions may also count as explanatory. The authors of the synthesis explained how evolution was possible on a Mendelian system of inheritance, answered skepticism about the sufficiency of selection, and thus explained why and how a Darwinian research program was warranted. While today we take many of these claims as obvious, they required argument, and part of the explanatory work of the formal sciences is providing such arguments. Surely, Fisher and Wright had competing views as to the optimal means of generating adaptation. Nevertheless, they had common opponents and a common unifying and explanatory goal that their mathematical demonstrations served. Introduction: Morrison's challenge Fisher v. Wright revisited The early synthesis Conclusion: unification and explanation reconciled.
|Keywords||unification explanation modern synthesis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Confirmation and Explaining How Possible.Patrick Forber - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 41 (1):32-40.
On the Structure of Explanatory Unification: The Case of Geographical Economics.Uskali Mäki & Caterina Marchionni - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):185-195.
Confirmation and Explaining How Possible.Patrick Forber - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (1):32-40.
Two Strategies for Investigating the Evolution of Behavior.Michael Trestman - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (6):871-889.
Similar books and articles
Dissecting Explanatory Power.Petri Ylikoski & Jaakko Kuorikoski - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (2):201–219.
Explanatory Relevance Across Disciplinary Boundaries: The Case of Neuroeconomics.Jaakko Kuorikoski & Petri Ylikoski - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):219–228.
Inference to the Best Explanation, Coherence and Other Explanatory Virtues.Adolfas Mackonis - 2013 - Synthese 190 (6):975-995.
Evolutionary Theory in the 1920s: The Nature of the "Synthesis".Sahotra Sarkar - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1215-1226.
Evolutionary Theory in the 1920s: The Nature of the “Synthesis”.Sahotra Sarkar - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1215-1226.
Explanation in Classical Population Genetics.Anya Plutynski - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1201-1214.
Explanatory Unification and Scientific Understanding.Jennifer Wilson Mulnix - 2011 - Acta Philosophica 20 (2):383 - 404.
Unification, Explanation and Explaining Unity: The Fisher–Wright Controversy.Margaret Morrison - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):233-245.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #118,161 of 2,146,284 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,409 of 2,146,284 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.