Theoria 77 (4):333-367 (2011)
The Asymmetry consists of two claims. (A) That a possible person's life would be abjectly miserable –less than worth living – counts against bringing that person into existence. But (B) that a distinct possible person's life would be worth living or even well worth living does not count in favour of bringing that person into existence. In recent years, the view that the two halves of the Asymmetry are jointly untenable has become increasingly entrenched. If we say all persons matter morally whether they exist or not and on that basis try to explain the first half of the Asymmetry, we lose the second half of the Asymmetry. If we say that some persons do not matter morally and some do and on that basis try to explain the second half of the Asymmetry, we lose the first half of the Asymmetry – or else find ourselves with a principle that is either inconsistent or otherwise deeply troubled in some way that has nothing to do with the content of the Asymmetry itself. In this article, I propose an alternative approach to the Asymmetry which I will call Variabilism. By understanding each and every person, whether existing or not, to matter morally but variably– such that the moral significance of any loss incurred by any person is considered to depend, not on who incurs that loss and whether that person matters morally, but rather on where that loss is incurred in relation to the person who incurs it – we can both nicely ground the two halves of the Asymmetry and avoid the conceptual difficulties that have plagued competing approaches
|Keywords||Moral Actualism Prior Existence View loss or harm the Asymmetry procreative choice value of nonexistence Totalism Neutrality Intuition|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Voices From Another World: Must We Respect the Interests of People Who Do Not, and Will Never, Exist?Caspar Hare - 2007 - Ethics 117 (3):498-523.
Citations of this work BETA
An Asymmetry in the Ethics of Procreation.Melinda A. Roberts - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (11):765-776.
Asymmetric Population Axiology: Deliberative Neutrality Delivered.Kalle Grill - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-18.
Variabilism Is Not the Solution to the Asymmetry.Per Algander - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):1-9.
Does the Non-Identity Problem Imply a Double Standard for Physicians and Patients?Melinda A. Roberts - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):38 - 39.
Similar books and articles
Asymmetry and Transcendence: On Scepticism and First Philosophy.Paul Davies - 2005 - Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):118-140.
Pain, Injury, and First/Third-Person Asymmetry.Katherine J. Morris - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (1):125-56.
Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence.Adam Elga - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (S1):S313-.
Understanding the Time-Asymmetry of Radiation.Jill North - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1086-1097.
The Selfish Gender, or the Reproduction of Gender Asymmetry in Gender Studies.T. V. Barchunova - 2003 - Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):3-25.
Thank Goodness That Argument Is Over: Explaining the Temporal Value Asymmetry.Christopher Suhler & Craig Callender - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12 (15):1-16.
The Completeness of the Pragmatic Solution to Moore's Paradox in Belief: A Reply to Chan.John N. Williams - 2013 - Synthese 190 (12):2457-2476.
Asymmetrical Genders: Phenomenological Reflections on Sexual Difference.Silvia Stoller & tr Nielsen, Camilla - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (2):7-26.
Causing People to Exist and Saving People's Lives.Jeff McMahan - 2013 - Journal of Ethics 17 (1-2):5-35.
“The Self-Other Asymmetry and Act Utilitarianism.”.Clay Splawn - 2001 - Utilitas 13 (3):323-333.
Added to index2011-10-12
Total downloads80 ( #63,628 of 2,153,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #15,137 of 2,153,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?