Measuring evaluative computational differences in humans

(2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Science fiction about intelligent aliens has long imagined a science of sociology with typologies that apply universally, much as the periodic table of the elements applies to atoms on all planets. The GRIN model purports to offer such a universal typology. This study offers the first instrument to measure its manifestation in humans: the Gadfly-Relational-Institutional-Negotiator Self-Quiz (GRINSQ). It reports evidence of the GRINSQ's reliability, as well as its structural, content, convergent and pragmatic validity, including relationships to the Moral Judgment Test (MJT), Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ), and Big Five personality traits. The evidence supports the hypotheses that humans specialize by GRIN-type, and that this specialization relates to differences in personality, morality, political orientation, career, religion, family type, and identification with crime.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,335

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Our responsibility to manage evaluative diversity.Christopher Santos-Lang - 2014 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 44 (2):16-19.
Mapping the moral domain.Jesse Graham, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva & Peter H. Ditto - 2011 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (2):366-385.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-24

Downloads
3 (#1,854,122)

6 months
2 (#1,805,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references