Abstract

Existentialist misunderstandings of "being and time" are analyzed. using ryle's early review as an example, a general tendency is described that confuses the viewpoint of division one with heidegger's own position. but "being and time's" ontological plan makes the meaning of division one's preparatory analytic depend entirely on the primordial and temporal interpretation in division two. common sense and existentialist concepts of time are briefly compared with heideggerian temporality