Simulation, simplicity, and selection: an evolutionary perspective on high-level mindreading [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 152 (2):271 - 285 (2011)
Abstract
In this paper, I argue that a natural selection-based perspective gives reasons for thinking that the core of the ability to mindread cognitively complex mental states is subserved by a simulationist process—that is, that it relies on nonspecialised mechanisms in the attributer's cognitive architecture whose primary function is the generation of her own decisions and inferences. In more detail, I try to establish three conclusions. First, I try to make clearer what the dispute between simulationist and non-simulationist theories of mindreading fundamentally is about. Second, I try to make more precise an argument that is sometimes hinted at in support of the former: this 'argument from simplicity' suggests that, since natural selection disfavours building extra cognitive systems where this can be avoided, simulationist theories of mindreading are more in line with natural selection than their competitors. As stated, though, this argument overlooks the fact that building extra cognitive systems can also yield benefits: in particular, it can allow for the parallel processing of multiple problems and it makes for the existence of backups for important elements of the organism's mind. I therefore try to make this argument more precise by investigating whether these benefits also apply to the present case—and conclude negatively. My third aim in this paper is to use this discussion of mindreading as a means for exploring the promises and difficulties of evolutionary arguments in philosophy and psychology more generally
Keywords Mindreading  Evolution  Simulation  Theory  Simplicity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11098-009-9476-5
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Brainstorms.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - MIT Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Benefits of Rule Following: A New Account of the Evolution of Desires.Armin Schulz - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 44 (4a):595-603.
The Benefits of Rule Following: A New Account of the Evolution of Desires.Armin W. Schulz - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):595-603.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-11-25

Total downloads
63 ( #86,477 of 2,199,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #149,569 of 2,199,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature