The Structure of McTaggart's Argument

Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):668 - 677 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

THE RECURRENT CLAIM that time is unreal has, by many, been judged as unintelligible and arguments in its favor as fallacious.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The reality of now.William Seager - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):69 – 82.
Mc Taggart and the Truth about Time.Heather Dyke - 2002 - In Craig Callender (ed.), Time, Reality and Experience. Cambridge University Press. pp. 137-.
Mctaggart's argument.Denis Corish - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (1):77-99.
McTaggart and indexing the copula.Bradley Rettler - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (3):431-434.
Reconstructing McTaggart's Argument.George N. Schlesinger - 1983 - Philosophy 58 (226):541 - 543.
A Token-based Semantic Analysis of McTaggart's Paradox.Cheng-Chih Tsai - 2011 - Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 10:107-124.
How fast does time pass?Ned Markosian - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):829-844.
Modality and Mellor's Mctaggart.M. J. Cresswell - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (2):163 - 170.
Farewell to McTaggart’s Argument?Michael Tooley - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (2):243-255.
McTaggart on Time.David H. Sanford - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (166):371 - 378.
The structure of the skeptical argument.Anthony Brueckner - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):827-835.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
22 (#708,419)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references