Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):165-184 (2008)

Authors
Abstract
In this review of Christopher Winch's new book, Education, Autonomy and Critical Thinking (2006), I discuss its main theses, supporting some and criticising others. In particular, I take issue with several of Winch's claims and arguments concerning critical thinking and rationality, and deplore his reliance on what I suggest are problematic strains of the later Wittgenstein. But these criticisms are not such as to upend Winch's powerful critique of antiperfectionism and 'strong autonomy' or his defence of 'weak autonomy'. His account of autonomy as an educational aim is important and in several respects compelling.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00611.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,864
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Content and Criticism: The Aims of Schooling.William Hare - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 29 (1):47–60.
Content and Criticism: The Aims of Schooling.William Hare - 1995 - Philosophy of Education 29 (1):47-60.
Content and Criticism.William Hare - 1995 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 14 (3):13-27.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Epistemology in Excess? A Response to Williams.Siegel Harvey - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (1):193-213.
Epistemology in Excess? A Response to Williams.Siegel Harvey - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 50 (4).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
153 ( #66,085 of 2,433,155 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #114,812 of 2,433,155 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes