You can't lose what you ain't never had: A reply to Marquis on abortion

Philosophical Studies 96 (1):59-72 (1999)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Logic   Philosophy of Mind   Philosophy of Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1004224102333
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Abortion and Moral Risk.D. Moller - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (3):425-443.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Marquis: A Defense of Abortion?Scott D. Gelfand - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (2):135–145.
Why I Was Never a Zygote.Robert Lane - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):63-83.
Abortion, Persons, and Futures of Value.Donald Wilson - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):86-97.
Reply to Di Nucci: Why the Counterexamples Succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
A Critique of “the Best Secular Argument Against Abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Abortion, Competing Entitlements, and Parental Responsibility.Alex Rajczi - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):379-395.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
204 ( #21,005 of 2,202,422 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #35,316 of 2,202,422 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature