You can't lose what you ain't never had: A reply to Marquis on abortion

Philosophical Studies 96 (1):59-72 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Long as you love me, it's alright?Henry S. Richardson - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (2):183-195.
Moral Dilemmas, by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. [REVIEW]Philip L. Quinn - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (3):693-697.
The Benefits of Coming into Existence.Krister Bykvist - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (3):335-362.
What is History for? Reply to Critics of The Dawn of Analysis.S. Soames - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (3):645-665.
A Light Theory with Heavy Burdens.Joshua Gert - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):57-70.
Reply to Manson. [REVIEW]John Campbell - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):145 - 153.
Reply to Gallimore.Ram Neta - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (1):71 - 72.
Reply to Christensen.Jarrett Leplin - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (1):51 - 52.
Reply to Bermudez and Bonjour.Hilary Kornblith - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (2):337-349.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
422 (#49,168)

6 months
20 (#173,941)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Abortion and Moral Risk.D. Moller - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (3):425-443.
Killing and Impairing Fetuses.Prabhpal Singh - 2022 - The New Bioethics 28 (2):127-138.
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Thomson 50 Years Later.Elliott R. Crozat - 2024 - American Philosophical Quarterly 61 (2):177-197.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references