You can't lose what you ain't never had: A reply to Marquis on abortion

Philosophical Studies 96 (1):59-72 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marquis: A defense of abortion?Scott D. Gelfand - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (2):135–145.
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
Why I Was Never a Zygote.Robert Lane - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):63-83.
Abortion, competing entitlements, and parental responsibility.Alex Rajczi - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):379-395.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
417 (#45,581)

6 months
24 (#113,849)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Abortion and Moral Risk.D. Moller - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (3):425-443.
Killing and Impairing Fetuses.Prabhpal Singh - 2022 - The New Bioethics 28 (2):127-138.
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Thomson 50 Years Later.Elliott R. Crozat - 2024 - American Philosophical Quarterly 61 (2):177-197.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references