More me? Substance concepts and self concepts

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):85-85 (1998)
Abstract
User intentions invoked to account for the distinctive way in which public-language natural-kind terms gather their extensions are inapplicable in the case of Millikan's substance concepts. I suggest that theoretical justification is preferable and available and raise exploratory questions about the applicability of the notion of substance concepts to the genesis of self concepts.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X98450404
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,146
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Concepts.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Whatever Happened to Meaning?Jean M. Mandler - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):79-80.
Beyond Substance Concepts in Cognitive Development.Katherine Nelson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):81-82.
Can Mere Phonemes Be Components of Millikan's Substance Concepts?Niko Scharer - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):83-84.
Animal Concepts.Colin Allen - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):66-66.
Substance.Justin Broackes - 2006 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):131–166.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

12 ( #369,079 of 2,151,990 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #398,812 of 2,151,990 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums