Knowledge Beyond the Margin for Error

Mind 116 (463):717-722 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Epistemicists say there is a last positive instance in a sorites sequence-we just cannot know which is the last. Timothy Williamson explains that knowledge requires a margin for error and this ensures that the last heap will not be knowable as a heap. However, there is a class of disjunctive predicates for which knowledge at the thresholds is possible. They generate sorites paradoxes that cannot be diagnosed with the margin for error principle

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Williamson on inexact knowledge.Anna Mahtani - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (2):171 - 180.
Vagueness and Margin for error principles.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):107-125.
An Application.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - In Knowledge and its limits. New York: Oxford University Press.
Inexact knowledge.Timothy Williamson - 1992 - Mind 101 (402):217-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#210,565)

6 months
9 (#437,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roy Sorensen
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references