An Immanent Machine: Reconsidering grades, historical and present

Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (7):762-778 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At some point the mechanics of schooling begin running of their own accord. Such has become the case with grades (A's, B's, C's, etc.). This article reconsiders the history of grades through the concepts of immanence and abstract machines from the oeuvre of Deleuze and Guattari. In the first section, the history of grades as presently written until now is laid out. In the second, the concepts of immanence and abstract machines are described, and in the third section, problems are raised by reconsidering grades as machines (grade-machines).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Is a Climbing Grade Anyway?Richard G. Graziano - 2010-09-24 - In Fritz Allhoff & Stephen E. Schmid (eds.), Climbing ‐ Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 206–217.
Grades of Discrimination: Indiscernibility, Symmetry, and Relativity.Tim Button - 2017 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (4):527-553.
Deleuze & Guattari: Emergent Law.Jamie Murray - 2013 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Measurement and desert: Why grades cannot be deserved.Toby Napoletano - 2021 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (4):282-292.
The Case for Motivational Grading.John Immerwahr - 2011 - Teaching Philosophy 34 (4):335-346.
What Can Be Fairly Factored Into Final Grades?Jennifer McCrickerd - 2012 - Teaching Philosophy 35 (3):275-291.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#102,555)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations