Possibilities, Intentions and Threats: Dual Use in the Life Sciences Reconsidered

Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):741-756 (2012)
Due to the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the anthrax letters of a few weeks later, the concept of dual use has spread widely in the life sciences during the past decade. This article is aimed at a clarification of the dual use concept and its scope of application for the life sciences. Such a clarification would greatly facilitate the work of policymakers seeking to ensure security while avoiding undesirable interventions of government in the conduct of science. The article starts with an overview of the main developments in life sciences in relation to dual use. This is illustrated by discussions on synthetic biology and dual use. The findings lead to a reconsideration of the dual use concept. An area in need of further attention is to what extent threats and intentions should have impact on the definition of dual use. Possible threats are analyzed against the background of the phenomenon of securitization of health care and life sciences: considering these sectors of society in security terms. Some caveats that should be taken into account in a dual use policy are described. An acceptable, adequate and applicable definition of the dual use concept could help researchers, universities, companies and policy makers. Such a definition should build upon, but go beyond, the view developed in the influential Fink-report, which concentrates on the so-called ‘experiments of concern’, e.g. experiments that enhance the virulence of pathogens (National Research Council of the National Academies 2004) It will be argued that—in addition to these more technical aspects—a definition of dual use should include the aspect of threats and intentions.
Keywords Dual use  Biosecurity  Biological weapons  Threat  Securitization
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9266-2
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,479
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
John Forge (2010). A Note on the Definition of “Dual Use”. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):111-118.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
John Forge (2010). A Note on the Definition of “Dual Use”. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):111-118.
Louise Bezuidenhout (2013). Data Sharing and Dual-Use Issues. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):83-92.
James Friedrich (2000). Fleshing Out a Dual-System Solution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):671-672.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #313,427 of 1,925,766 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #418,414 of 1,925,766 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.