Authors
Han van Wietmarschen
University College London
Abstract
I argue that reliance on political testimony conflicts with two democratic values: the value of mutual justifiability and the value of equality of opportunity for political influence. Reliance on political testimony is characterized by a reliance on the assertions of others directly on a political question the citizen is asked to answer as part of a formal democratic decision procedure. Reliance on expert testimony generally, even in the context of political decision-making, does not similarly conflict with democratic values. As a consequence of the argument, citizens have a pro tanto reason to rely on their own political judgment when determining their vote, and democratic societies have a reason to only ask citizens questions they are able to answer without reliance on political testimony.
Keywords democracy  voting  testimony  public reason  political equality  moral testimony  political influence  ethics of voting  political epistemology  democratic deliberation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/1470594x18798062
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,247
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Capitalism and Freedom.Milton Friedman - 1962 - Ethics 74 (1):70-72.
A Defense of Moral Deference.David Enoch - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (5):229-258.

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Public Justification and the Veil of Testimony.Sean Donahue - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (4):378-396.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

II—Moral Testimony Pessimism: A Defence.Roger Crisp - 2014 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 88 (1):129-143.
Testimony From a Popperian Perspective.Antoni Diller - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):419-456.
The Propriety of Expert Ethics Testimony in The Courtroom.Taiwo A. Oriola - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 6:1-25.
Oral History and The Epistemology of Testimony.Tim Kenyon - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (1):45-66.
Democracy and Equality.Steven Wall - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):416–438.
Constructing the Space of Testimony.Nicholas Tampio - 2011 - Political Theory 39 (5):600-629.
Moral Realism and Reliance on Moral Testimony.Joshua Blanchard - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (5):1141-1153.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-26

Total views
46 ( #231,934 of 2,448,588 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #117,245 of 2,448,588 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes