- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory
Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press (1996)
Abstract
William Baird collection in Social Sciences is the gift of the Estate of William Cameron Baird.Author's Profile
ISBN(s)
9781487574475 0802071376
DOI
10.3138/9781487574475
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Chapters
Similar books and articles
Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments: A Theory of Argument Structure.James B. Freeman - 1991 - Berlin and New York: Foris Publications.
The Epistemic Value of Moral Considerations: Justification, Moral Encroachment, and James' 'Will To Believe'.Michael Pace - 2011 - Noûs 45 (2):239-268.
Argument Structure:: Representation and Theory.James B. Freeman - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
D. N. Walton, Argument structure, A Pragmatic Theory.Mark Vorobej - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (3):421-425.
Refuting a Standpoint by Appealing to Its Outcomes: Reductio ad Absurdum vs. Argument from Consequences.Henrike Jansen - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (3):249-266.
State-of-the-Art: The Structure of Argumentation. [REVIEW]A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (4):447-473.
Logical Argument Structures in Decision-making.Jane Macoubrie - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (3):291-313.
Arguer's Position: A Pragmatic Study of Ad Hominem Attack, Criticism, Refutation, and Fallacy.Douglas Neil Walton - 1985 - Westport, CT, USA: Greenwood Press.
Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development. [REVIEW]J. Anthony Blair - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):365-379.
Argument Explanation Complementarity and the Structure of Informal Reasoning.Gregory Randolph Mayes - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (1):92-111.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-03
Downloads
1 (#1,513,170)
6 months
1 (#483,919)
2015-02-03
Downloads
1 (#1,513,170)
6 months
1 (#483,919)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof.Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken & Douglas Walton - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (10-15):875-896.
Argument Structure:: Representation and Theory.James B. Freeman - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: Argumentation schemes and generalisations. [REVIEW]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed & Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):125-165.
Rhetoric and argumentation: how clinical practice guidelines think.Jonathan Fuller - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):433-441.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5c86f9596c-kk9gx N